← Back home

What this page does

Keep this question’s change, evidence, and possible invalidation in one place. Return later to see whether the market kept changing its mind.

Tracking this question
UNUSUAL 65/99
What looks unusual Unexpected buying in a low-probability outcome
Tracking Live
Before

This outcome was not a favorite before.

What changed

About 38% of this candidate capital entered outcomes that were at 35% or lower at the time.

Why this deserves attention nowOn “Will Lula win the most votes in the second round of the Brazil presidential election from Amapá,” 1 markets moved up and 1 moved down. Which side saw the change first?

Will Lula win the most votes in the second round of the Brazil presidential election from Amapá?

Related questions are moving in opposite directions, so there is no consensus yet. See where the disagreement is and what evidence could change it.

What looks unusual
  • 38%About 38% of this candidate capital entered outcomes that were at 35% or lower at the time.
  • 6%The related market price moved again afterward
  • 1919 different buyers bought the same outcome
What the market is saying now
Market-implied chance of “Yes”74% 77%
Buying volume$14.1K
Different buyers19
Related questions2

Among checked markets: 1 support this direction · 1 move against it

Flavio Bolsonaro (win)74% → 77%
Lula (lose)28% → 22%
Why this matters to you

If this political outcome becomes more likely, related policy, industry, and regional risks may be repriced.

  • policy-exposed industries
  • local currency
  • regional risk
What would strengthen the signal

The exact effect depends on the candidate's policies and implementation, not only the chance of winning.

What to check next time

Watch whether election, legislative-control, and key-policy questions continue to align.

What supports this view
Supporting evidence

7 independent taker actions bought the same outcome;2 related markets were involved;$14,075 candidate capital。

What could overturn it

Public data cannot reveal why buyers acted or guarantee the outcome.

Data quality

insufficient

Post-detection price tracking
+1h: +3pp+6h: -13pp+24h: -6pp
Original marketsOpen source 1